Friday, June 26, 2020

NJSBA Capitol Report: Association Seeks Resolution of Municipal Court Issues

NJSBA Capitol Report: Association Seeks Resolution of Municipal Court Issues
In response to concerns expressed by practitioners, the New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) reached out to state officials about municipal court issues. In a trio of letters, the organization asked for uniformity in plea-by-mail processes, information on expansion of a municipal court portal, a central repository for municipal prosecutor information and priority for ignition interlock services.
The NJSBA wrote to the New Jersey chief justice, governor and state attorney general with its concerns.
“The plea-by-mail process is confusing, inconsistently applied, does not effectively permit the disposal of many municipal court matters, and does not meet the notification requirements concerning potential immigration consequences,” NJSBA President Kimberly A. Yonta wrote in a letter to Chief Justice Stuart Rabner asking for a uniform, interactive form that would be accepted in all municipal court
She also asked for additional information about an effort to expand the current municipal court public portal that allows people charged with certain offenses to pay tickets online. The NJSBA contends it has not been included in discussions about the plans for expansion of the portal, and practitioners have many questions, including whether attorneys will have access to it. Currently, defendants cannot use the online portal if they are represented by counsel.
One of the chief concerns about both plea-by-mail and expansion of the online portal is the potential consequences for certain immigrant defendants. The NJSBA urged that any plea-by-mail forms and the resolution of any municipal court matter include a reference to potential immigration consequences as a result of the action, and ensure there has been an opportunity for a defendant to explore those potential consequences. 
Yonta noted the lack of a current roster of municipal prosecutors as another issue interfering with the resolution of municipal court cases. In a letter to Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal asking for a central listing of prosecutors, Yonta wrote, “This has become an important, necessary resource for defendants, defense attorneys and other involved parties to address pending municipal court matters during the COVID-19 shutdown.” She also suggested that, consistent with its oversight of municipal prosecutors, the Attorney General’s Office should provide state email addresses through which municipal prosecutors can conduct municipal business separate from their private law firm business. This would have the added benefit of allowing future prosecutors to have all of the relevant background information about the current status of a pending matter.
Access to motor vehicle offices for defendants requiring interlock ignition systems was the subject of a letter from Yonta to Governor Phil Murphy. Acknowledging the opening of state offices in early June, Yonta asked that certain services be prioritized.
“The extended closure of MVC offices…has prevented individuals from getting ‘chipped’ and obtaining the requisite embossed license,” she wrote, noting without those services, defendants are unable to drive, and the state does not gain the benefit of the safety assurances the interlock is meant to provide.

The full text of the letters can be viewed at njsba.com.
source https://community.njsba.com/blogs/njsba-staff/2020/06/24/njsba-capitol-report-association-seeks-resolution?ssopc=1&ct=80119e0a6c3c512a52a6aee6171f6dd5bbe901894e9cc644e657797358cd0a9e5f8b95bd980962cc0cb58550dc442d67a0be83eaf1ad03e9bf2ee0031f840363

Tuesday, June 9, 2020

What is a Civil Reservation in a Municipal Court case?


What is a Civil Reservation in a Municipal Court case?

       If there was an accident with personal injury, the ticketed driver and car owner is going to be sued. Often the lawsuit claims damages in excess of an insurance policy. If the jury award is greater than insurance, they could go after your house and assets.
       If someone pleads guilty to a traffic ticket, the guilty plea is evidence before the jury, unless your attorney files a Motion for a Civil Reservation. If the Judge grants your attorney’s Motion, the guilty plea cannot be considered by the jury in the lawsuit.
       The Motion must be made in open court and on notice to the injured person.  

Motion for Civil Reservation
Rule 7:6-2. Pleas, Plea Agreements

(a) Pleas Allowed, Guilty Plea.

(1) ……. Upon the request of the defendant, the court may, at the time of the acceptance of a guilty plea, order that the plea shall not be evidential in any civil proceeding. If a defendant refuses to plead or stands mute or if the court refuses to accept a guilty plea, the court shall enter a plea of not guilty. If a guilty plea is entered, the court may hear the witnesses in support of the complaint prior to judgment and sentence and after such hearing may, in its discretion, refuse to accept the plea.

Sunday, April 12, 2020

Spring 2020 Municipal Court cases

 Spring 2020 Municipal Court cases
1. No more phony stop for license plate holder partially obstructing Garden State name State v Roman- Rosado
2. Elimination of mandatory DL suspensions related to drugs and other offenses
3. Loss of license for the CDS in Motor Vehicle 39:4-49.1 eliminated   
4. No Insurance 39:6B-2  Mandatory suspension on no insurance eliminated
5. Repealed Driver’s license suspension for Failure to appear for disorderly persons offense
6. Driver’s license suspension for Failure to comply with installment order Repealed
7. Court claims parked car with engine running is operation. Attorney seeks Supreme court reversal
State v. Thompson
8. Roadside statements inadmissible where roadside stop was improper State v. Alessi
9. Order – Limited Relaxation of Prohibition on Plea Bargaining in Municipal Court DWI Cases Implicated by State v. Cassidy 
10. Annual Happy Hour & Networking Social July 10, 2020
11 photo Expungement seminar

1. No more phony stop for license plate holder partially obstructing Garden State words State v Roman- RosadoA-3703-17T4
Following the stop of defendant's car for allegedly violating N.J.S.A. 39:3-33 because the license plate frame on the car's rear license plate "concealed or otherwise obscured" the words "Garden State" at the bottom of the license plate, a warrantless search of the car uncovered an unloaded handgun. The trial court denied defendant's motion to suppress the search and seizure of the handgun, and defendant subsequently pled guilty to second-degree certain persons not to possess a weapon, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-7(b)(1).
In defendant's appeal, the court was asked to decide: (1) whether there was reasonable suspicion to stop defendant's car for violating N.J.S.A. 39:3-33; and (2) whether the subsequent search and seizure of the handgun was legally permissible.
Based upon the common understanding of the words "conceal" and "obscure," this court concludes there was no reasonable suspicion to stop defendant's car for violating N.J.S.A. 39:3-33 where the minimal covering of "Garden State" did not make the words indecipherable. Hence, the seized gun was inadmissible to prove a second-degree certain persons offense.
For the sake of completeness, the court further decides that even if there was reasonable suspicion to stop defendant's car for a N.J.S.A. 39:3-33 violation, the subsequent search was not legally permissible because it did not satisfy the State's proffered exceptions to conduct a warrantless search of an automobile, i.e., a search incident to arrest, or a protective sweep.
Accordingly, the court reverses and vacates the conviction for second-degree certain persons not to possess weapons, and remands so defendant can move to vacate his guilty plea and have the judgment of conviction vacated pursuant to Rule 3:9-3(f).
2. Elimination of mandatory DL suspensions related to drugs and other offenses
On December 20, 2019, Governor Murphy signed S1080 into law as L. 2019, c. 276. Two provisions of this new law, namely Section 12 and subsection b. of Section 20, took effect on December 27, 2019. The remainder of this new law will take effect on January 1, 2021. 
Section 12 and subsection b. of Section 20, took effect on December 27, 2019 when the Governor submitted a certification to the Secretary of Transportation expressing his opposition to the enactment or enforcement of a law requiring driver’s license suspension for drug offenses as set forth in 23 U.S.C. § 159(a)(3)(A).
 Section 12 amended N.J.S.A. 39:4-49.1 to eliminate the suspension, revocation or postponement of driving privileges for a person who operates a motor vehicle on a highway while knowingly having in the person’s possession or in the motor vehicle any controlled dangerous substance or prescription drug without a valid prescription. Regarding the fine, this section excludes those persons who violate the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10 (Possession, use or being under the influence, or failure to make a lawful disposition) 
Also effective on December 27, 2019 is subsection b. of Section 20, which repealed N.J.S.A. 2C:35-16 and 39:5-30.13. New Jersey Statute 39:5-30.13 allowed for the suspension or postponement of driving privileges for persons convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for a drug offense in State court, federal court, or the District of Columbia. This law has been repealed. 
Also repealed effective December 27, 2019 is N.J.S.A. 2C:35-16 which provides for the forfeiture or postponement of driving privileges of anyone convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for an offense under Chapters 35 or 36 of Title 2C as well as the suspension, revocation or postponement of driving privileges for those persons admitted to supervisory treatment, i.e., conditional discharge under N.J.S.A. 2C:36A-1, or pretrial intervention under N.J.S.A. 2C:43-12, without a plea of guilty or finding of guilt. DL suspension for Conditional Discharge eliminated.

repealed 2C:35-16 - Forfeiture or postponement of driving privileges for conviction for a person convicted of or adjudicated delinquent for a violation of any offense defined in chapter  35 Drugs or chapter 36 Paraphernalia

3. Loss of license for the CDS in Motor Vehicle 39:4-49.1 eliminated   The legislature did away with loss of license for the CDS in motor vehicle 39:4-49.1.  New:A person shall not operate a motor vehicle on any highway while knowingly having in the person's possession or in the motor vehicle any controlled dangerous substance as classified in Schedules I, II, III, IV and V of the “New Jersey Controlled Dangerous Substances Act,” P.L.1970, c. 226 (C.24:21-1 et seq.) or any prescription legend drug, unless the person has obtained the substance or drug from, or on a valid written prescription of, a duly licensed physician, veterinarian, dentist, or other medical practitioner licensed to write prescriptions intended for the treatment or prevention of disease in humans or animals or unless the person possesses a controlled dangerous substance pursuant to a lawful order of a practitioner or lawfully possesses a Schedule V substance.
A person who violates this section, except a person who violates the provisions of N.J.S.2C:35-10, shall be fined not less than $50.


4. No Insurance 39:6B-2  Mandatory suspension on no insurance eliminated
33:1-81 Misrepresenting age to induce sale or delivery to minor; disorderly person –No more mandatory DL suspension
39:4-56.5 Abandonment of motor vehicle revised 2019- No more DL suspension 

5. Repealed Driver’s license suspension for Failure to appear for 
disorderly persons offense,a petty disorderly persons offense, a violation of a municipal ordinance, or a violation of any other law of this State N.J.S.2B:12-31

Repealed 2A:4A-43.3.Suspension, postponement of right to operate motor vehicle [was with 2A:4A-43) for an initial act of graffiti ] section 6 of P.L.1995, c.251 (C.2A:4A-43.3);

Repealed 2C:33-3.1 Penalties for juvenile violating N.J.S.2C:33-3.False public alarms. No more Driver license suspension section 2 of P.L.1999, c.195 (C.2C:33-3.1);


6. Driver’s license suspension for Failure to comply with installment order Repealed 39:4-203.2.

39:5-30.13. repealed Suspension, revocation, postponement of driving privilege for persons convicted of certain drug offenses in any federal court or other states

39:4-56.5 Abandonment of motor vehicle revised 2019
No more DL suspension 

7. Court claims parked car with engine running is operation. Attorney seeks Supreme court reversal
State v. Thompson
    In this appeal, the court held that an intoxicated defendant asleep and behind the wheel of a parked motor vehicle with its engine running is "operating" the vehicle within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:4-50(a).Docket A-1909-19T6  

     Defendant appealed from his convictions for DUI and refusing to submit to a breath test. Defendant argued that the state failed to present sufficient evidence to prove the statutory element that defendant was "operating" his vehicle under the influence of alcohol or that he had a conscious intent to do so. The court rejected defendant's argument and affirmed his conviction. The court noted that the evidence at trial showed that police were called to a convenience store where defendant was observed sleeping in his car with the engine running. As officers woke defendant, they noticed the strong odor of alcohol on his breath. Defendant acknowledged to officers that he had "a couple of drinks." After failing field sobriety tests, defendant was arrested. At the police station, defendant acknowledged that he had prescriptions for methadone, hydrocodone, Xanax, and Cymbalta and that he had consumed two alcoholic drinks within a three hours period. The court held that this evidence was sufficient for the factfinder to concluded that defendant was intoxicated while sleeping behind the wheel of his vehicle. The court ruled that defendant was "operating" his vehicle since operation of a motor vehicle could include sitting or sleeping behind the wheel of a vehicle with the engine running, even if the vehicle is not observed in motion. Finally, the court found defendant's other contentions on appeal to have insufficient merit to warrant discussion. 
     Source Daily Briefing, an exclusive New Jersey State Bar Association member benefit, in partnership with the New Jersey Law Journal. Join the NJSBA for this benefit!
https://www.law.com/njlawjournal/almID/1581570609NJA190919T/

8. Roadside statements inadmissible where roadside stop was improper State v. Alessi
The circumstances of this case do not legitimize the stop. Law enforcement must have reasonable and articulable suspicion of a traffic violation, the commission of a crime, or unlawful activity before executing a traffic stop. Accordingly, the roadside statement given by defendant during the unlawful stop should have been excluded at trial, and the Court affirms the Appellate Division’s reversal of her convictions for hindering apprehension and false reporting. Because defendant’s roadside statement permeated the trial, severely affecting her credibility and ability to mount a defense to the separate burglary charge, that conviction is reversed as well. 14-1-3686 

9. Order – Limited Relaxation of Prohibition on Plea Bargaining in Municipal Court DWI Cases Implicated by State v. Cassidy 
 SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY  
Pursuant to N.J. Const. Art. VI., sec. 2 par. 3, it is ORDERED that, effective immediately and until further order, the "Guidelines for Operation of Plea Agreements in the Municipal Courts of New Jersey," which is an Appendix to Part VII of the Rules Governing the Courts of the State of New Jersey, are supplemented and relaxed so as to permit plea agreements in post-conviction relief cases affected by the Supreme Court decision in State v. Eileen Cassidy235 N.J. 482 (2018)
This limited rule relaxation applies only to post-conviction relief proceedings in which evidential breath samples from defendants in driving while intoxicated (DWI) cases were procured using Alcotest machines calibrated without using a NIST-traceable thermometer, namely, the approximately 13,000 cases that involve findings of guilteither by trial or by plea, referred to in the Court's January 292019 order that designated a Special Master to make judicial and administrative decisions in matters affected by the Court's decision in Cassidy. 
In all other aspects, including for all cases not affected by the Court's decision in Cassidy, the "Guidelines for Operation of Plea Agreements in the Municipal Courts of New Jerseyremain in full force and effect. December 18, 2019 

10. Annual Happy Hour & Networking Social July 10, 2020 Co- sponsors requested
       Co-sponsored by NJ State Bar Association Sections & several Chambers of Commerce 
   For the past five years different Professional groups and Sections of the NJ State Bar Association have co-sponsored a Happy Hour and Social event for attorneys and business professionals. The Annual Summer Networking Happy Hour is July  10, 2020 at Bar Anticipation from 5:30-7:30. 
            We are requesting professional groups serve as co-sponsor for this Happy Hour.  There will be no cost to a professional group, and great benefit for your members.  It may even be a source of new members.  We only ask that you help publicize the event.  There will be a small table to greet members. 
Location: Bar Anticipation  
703 16th Avenue
Lake Como/ Belmar, NJ 07719 
Free food 5:15-7:15. The reduced price Happy Hour is 6-7PM with $2.00 House Drink, House Wine Special or Bud/Bud Light draft. We provide special VIP wristband.
     We ask each attendee to bring a canned food donation for the St. Matthews St. Vincent Food Bank.  

11 New trial ordered where police did not give full Miranda warning

State v Hager 
     The court considered whether the omission of one of the Miranda warnings during custodial interrogation adequately conveys the substance of the warnings and concluded it did not, notwithstanding the fact that defendant continuously interrupted the administration of the warnings. Acknowledging out-of-state authority holding that a suspect may waive Miranda warnings by interrupting their delivery, the court concluded that the suspect's interruption of the warnings does not discharge law enforcement of their duty to deliver them. Finding that the erroneous introduction of the partially unwarned statements was not harmless error, the court reversed defendant's conviction, which followed a bifurcated jury trial, and vacated his guilty plea on the weapons offense. Relying on United States v. Pagane, 542 U.S. 630 (2004), however, the court rejected defendant's contention that suppression of the weapon was mandated as a remedy for the Miranda violation despite the fact that the weapon was seized as a result of a search warrant based on the statements. (14-07-0678)

Allan Marain Esq. and Ken Vercammen speakers at Expungement seminar
Expungements to remove criminal arrests continue to be processed. The new Expungement law is starting in June 2020.
add if space
Mr. Marain notes on his website: Are you applying to nursing school? Would you like to be a teacher? Drive a school bus? Be a school crossing guard? Are you seeking a New Jersey firearms identification card? Perhaps you want to adopt a child or be a foster parent, or coach a Little League® baseball team. Maybe you're looking for a job in securities, or at Home Depot. Maybe you're just looking for a job, period. Any job. Were you ever charged with shoplifting? Or busted over a little weed?  Are any felony convictions, or even just arrests, on your record?

N.J. Municipal Court - Law Review SUBSCRIPTION INFO

      Please forward a check or voucher for $20.00 to receive the NJ Municipal Court Law Review.  This quarterly newsletter reports changes in New Jersey Court decisions, selected revised motor vehicle and criminal laws, cases, seminars, and information on Municipal Court practice.

      Vouchers accepted. Please send a stamped, self-addressed envelope for their return.  Multiple subscriptions encouraged.

      Please must send a $20.00 check payable to Vercammen & Associates, PC. 

Name:    ______________________________________
(or staple business card here)
Address:______________________________________
            
We also need your email address ________________________ 
Return to:
Kenneth A. Vercammen, Esq.,    
                Editor- NJ Municipal Court Law Review   
                2053 Woodbridge Ave.
                Edison, NJ 08817
                732-572-0500
               Tax ID # available

Criminal Articles from NJLaws Website and BeNotGuilty.com website

Criminal Law- Recent Cases

Cut & paste all reported and sometimes unreported criminal case squibs from NJ Judiciary.

Criminal Statutes and Criminal Jury Charges 

Drug & DWI Law 


Motor Vehicle Articles and NJ Title 39 Motor Vehicle laws http://njmotorvehicle.blogspot.com/

Municipal Court and Police Phone number and Directions 


New NJ Statutes , Recent cases and Court Rules


Traffic Law & Municipal Court- Articles from BeNotGuilty.com 


Defending DWI and Drug Possession (2020) Bound book
List Price: $59.00 USD
NJ State Bar’s new book
Written by: Kenneth A. Vercammen

     This informative handbook will provide you with guidance on how to handle everything pertaining to the drug and DWI defense - from the initial contact with the client, to walking into the courthouse, and managing the steps that follow. It is a “how to” manual that you and your staff can follow with checklists and forms.
This book is intended to help solo/small-firm attorneys and newly admitted attorneys prepare to handle these cases and to better represent their clients. This handbook will help attorneys represent persons charged with DWI, drug, and other criminal and traffic offenses.
Special Feature: Over 50 modifiable forms and motions
Over 50 forms and motions are included to help make you (and your staff) more efficient and productive, while also reducing the chance for mistakes.

Bonus!Also includes a section on marketing the DWI and drug defense practice.

Table of Contents:1 Pre-Interview
2 Office Interview and Preparing Notices to the Court and Prosecutor
3 Pretrial Motions
4 Trial Preparation
5 Trial
6 Sentencing and Post Trial
7 Supreme Court Caselaw and Federal Statutes
8 Marketing the DWI and Drug Defense Practice 
Book # 1177719   New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education  A Division of the NJSBA One Constitution Square, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 (732) 214-8500 · CustomerService@njsba.com


Friday, March 27, 2020

NJ Supreme Court order to adjourn cases until April 26, clients can check future court dates online

NJ Supreme Court order to adjourn cases until April 26, clients can check future court dates online
Municipal Court sessions are suspended through April 26, 2020,  during which period Municipal Court functions will continue [online only behind locked doors] as described in the March 14, 2020 notice; 
- Special Civil Part (DC) and Small Claims (SC) trial calendars are suspended through April 26, 2020; 
-  Landlord/tenant calendars are suspended through April 26, 2020, and lockouts of residential tenants (evictions) are suspended in accordance with Executive Order 106 (March 19, 2020) 
-No new civil or criminal jury trials will be conducted until further notice. More at https://www.njcourts.gov/notices/2020/n200327a.pdf?c=dQp

    We recommend all clients go online and look up their new court date. The Complaints /tickets must be handy which contains the full court code.

1.   The Municipal Court Case search is the tool to determine the municipal court hearing. The website is: https://portal.njcourts.gov/webe5/MPAWeb/index.jsp

    See: Welcome to Municipal Court Case Search (MCCS) - the fast, secure and convenient way to look up Municipal Traffic or Complaint information online. Please have your complaint or tickets in front of you
2.  Press Search to continue. You do not need a password to login 

Search One: 
Ticket Number  [For Traffic]
Complaint Number[For Criminal] 
Drivers License Number    [for all your traffic violations]
Full Name

3.   Press” I accept” on Disclaimer.
4.Select which method of search you would like to have in the Case search option, whether it is ticket number, complaint number, license number, or name (FML). 
5.Then you must click that you are not a robot.
6.At that point you should type in any of the identifying information that you have such as ticket number, complaint number, driver’s license number, or name. Once there press the search button. 
7.The subsequent search will reveal all case information for upcoming hearings, etc. of your client and any other issues .